California Homebuyers Tax Incentive Funds Depleted … Should We Increases Taxes and Fees to Pay More?

California legislators put a hundred million dollars on the table for first time homeowners to grab. Were they surprised when takers actually accepted the offer? Apparently this is so. They are now attempting to put more money in the coffers for this give-away.
The program is a tax credit that spreads across three years, in three equal payments, for buyers of new homes. The definition of new home is that it must be a single family residence, detached or attached, and never previously occupied. After purchase, the buyer must occupy the property for a minimum of two years and receives a credit of $10,000, or 5% of the price, whichever is less.
The program, passed in February 2009, put up one hundred million dollars for this incentive. Amazingly, this money was offered during a time when the state of California is, by some measures, bankrupt!
Now, there are two new bills pending in Sacramento that would add an additional $200-$300,000,000 to this program. In my opinion the original bill was unconscionable, considering the state of the California economy. To double or triple the original giveaway is totally incomprehensible.
These actions should definitely earn California an award for the greatest “tax and spend†state in our short history. Why does this bill only apply to new homes? If the state of California really wanted to help out the real estate market, why wouldn’t this bill apply to any home purchase?
It may be cynical, but could it be this just applies to new homes because the California new home builders contribute millions to the reelection campaigns of our state legislators? What would be extremely interesting, would be to look at the public record in one year from now to see how many state legislators who backed this program, received campaign contributions from new home builders.
For California homebuyers, especially first-time buyers, that qualify for the federal $8,000 credit as well as the California $10,000 credit, this is a great deal. But, is it really fair that tax payers are picking up the tab? Would it not make common sense if California wanted to pass such a program, to have it apply to all home purchases in order to reduce the current oversupply of existing homes? This program is doing nothing to lessen the supply of existing homes, vacant homes and bank foreclosures.
If this new buyer’s credit and pending new bills to escalate the funding, are not enough evidence that the California legislators ought to stay out of the real estate industry, perhaps remember what other mischief they’ve done. Mischief with good intentions and negative results is still mischief. These good folks extended the foreclosure process by 30 days in 2008, and then when that didn’t seem generous enough, added another 90 days (California housing) this year. When you add up all the legal requirements, our legislators are practically offering almost a year of living “mortgage-free.â€Â Are these California real estate laws really fair to the tax payers of California?
Watch the video related to Real Estate Tax
Extract from Eyeworks New Zealand TV program NZ Open Home: "A guide to investing in commercial real estate." Features Mark Withers, author of PROPERTY TAX and contributor to COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE INVESTORS GUIDE by Peter Aranyi www.EmpowerEducation.com [Used with permission.] ... commercial real estate property investing Mark Withers Empower Education Peter Aranyi www.EmpowerEducation.com
Help answer the question about Real Estate Tax
What are the downsides to dealing in Real Estate Tax Liens?There are a number for programs that talk about buying house for $.10-.15 on the $1, but they don't address the negative aspects of this type of real estate transaction. What are the pitfalls and why don't more people do this? I'm assuming there are more legal issues but would like to talk with people that do this. Feel free to email me to talk more in depth.
About Author
Read more of Bob's 'tell it like it is' real estate opinions & subscribe to his free RSS feed at:San Diego real estate blog Also visit San Diego real estate & San Diego real estate agents
August 1st, 2007 - 17:04
Call the county (or State) tax department and ask if they auction tax liens…..some do and some don't. Some auction the property for complete ownership to pay the tax lien, some don't….depends on the county/state
Mike
====================
August 1st, 2007 - 17:28
It all depends upon everything else. Real estate taxes are itemized deductions and are included with all the other itemized deductions. If the total of itemized deductions are less than the standard deduction, the standard deduction will be used and you basically get no benefit from the real estate tax deduction. Assuming you are itemizing your deductions, the actual benefit depends upon your tax bracket which depends upon your taxable income
August 2nd, 2007 - 07:25
You can deduct the real estate taxes that you paid in 2007, even if they are for previous years, if they are for your main or second home. You are correct that you can't deduct penalties or interest
August 2nd, 2007 - 16:14
I don't know what you mean by savings. The mortgage interest and property taxes are deducted on schedule A as you already know. That helps to reduce the amount of tax you owe at the end of the year. (if you would have owed any). I guess what you are asking is how much each paycheck will you save in federal income tax??
To figure that out you have to know how much interest per year your mortgage will be and how much property tax your house will be charged.
After you know those answers you can divide the total by the number of paychecks you receive a year and then have your employer reduce your federal witholding by that amount.
August 2nd, 2007 - 16:32
Check with your local real estate tax assessor to see if you can protest the assessed value. If so show up with all of your reasons. Some protestors win and some lose. Good luck.
August 3rd, 2007 - 01:21
August 3rd, 2007 - 14:18
That depends. If it was your principal residence, and if you lived in it for 2 out of the last 5 years immediately prior to the sale, then you may exclude up to $250,000 ($500,000 if married filing jointly) in gain from federal taxes. Excess gains are taxed as capital gains, as is the entire gain if you don't meet the ownership, residency and/or occupancy conditions.
CA law may vary on that. Consult a tax advisor in CA for full details.
August 4th, 2007 - 05:39
Not on your federal taxes, but some states have a rebate for part of your real estate tax. If you are in PA a widow can qualify, but there are income limits.
August 4th, 2007 - 09:36
Approximately 140,000 * .3 * 1.5 * 5/100
August 4th, 2007 - 15:17